By Damita Brown
Some of us would like to pretend that business as usual will suffice — that the unfortunate outcomes of Tuesday’s election have no bearing on how we go about the unending progressive movement for inclusion, equity, peace and justice in this county. Others are quite clear that it is more important than ever to make sure the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is held accountable for the ways in which it has failed to uphold a truly democratic process. After all, when it became clear that the DNC deck was stacked against Sen. Bernie Sanders, the fallout went no further than Debbie Wasserman Schultz and there was no effort to change that. Perhaps even the DNC regrets the way it ignored all the polls that had Sanders defeating the Republican candidate. Still others think it is time to rebuild the Democratic party with progressive leadership and intentions. All of these ideas and more could be given thorough examination.
Some of us stood in College Green Park in Iowa City last week and listened as Sanders reminded us that his campaign had served a vital purpose. It had helped to create the most progressive platform that our country has ever seen. Many of us who remain devout Sanders supporters decided to hold our noses and vote for Hillary Clinton, largely because we felt this would be a more socially responsible action than either staying at home or diluting the effort to defeat the Republican candidate.
For a long time I had refused to accept Hillary Clinton as a responsible choice. People talked about the level of misogyny they saw reflected in the comments about her. I did not see Clinton’s gender as the issue, I saw her position on the issues as an issue. Imagine, for example, if she had even modestly acknowledged the rights of the Standing Rock Sioux or the abuse of the eminent domain laws on farmland in Iowa. Imagine if she had commented on the threat to the drinking water of millions of people by a leaking oil pipeline. Most of the progressives I have read or talked to could not support her silence. And the lack of trust many of us felt had to do with her affiliations with entities like Monsanto, Wal-mart and the corporations that funded her campaign. But regardless of Clinton’s stance on the issues, I think the real problem lies elsewhere.
Who could deny that there are problems within the electoral system in this country? Examples of these problems abound: the unnecessary and corrupt influence of big money, the dearth of third party options, the specious influence of the electoral college, the failure of the government to fully protect and enforce the Voting Rights Act, voter suppression, gratuitous gerrymandering, illogical voter ID restrictions, the corrosive sway of yellow journalism, the absence of accountability among mainstream media outlets, the failure of our law enforcement or the judicial system to exact due process regarding accusations of rape, financial malfeasance, tax evasion, sexual assault, espionage, threats of violence against other candidates, inciting violence against Mexicans, Blacks, Muslims and women, and much more. These are serious problems.
We need expedient and well-coordinated action to build local progressive networks that will help us address these and other problems in the electoral system. To do so goes hand in hand with delivering candidates who are not only willing to listen to and respect the electorate (all of the electorate), but who see that as the most important part of their job. We need alternative choices to Democrats and Republicans who take the votes they get for granted. Progressives must be decisive and determined in making sure we have a well-informed public that can access not only registration and voting venues easily, but also can also enjoy independent forums that educate them about the most pressing social, economic and political issues affecting them. We need progressive coalition politics that offer 21st century platforms — those that are on a par with other advanced western political states.
In my view, sustaining any progressive gains of the last 50 years or developing strategies for the 2020 elections means organizing locally. I agree with [Johnson County Supervisor] Mike Carberry when he calls for developing a local coalition that can mobilize at a moment’s notice to support or protest issues, initiative and candidates based on our shared values. Furthermore, if ever there was a time to convene a local progressive summit to discuss and develop our options, that time in now. Let us do so while we still can. As we find out what we are made of in the next few years, I hope we put love and kindness at the center of our efforts to build democracy. I am envisioning a future that is not strangled by the dictates of the super rich.
We need a progressive summit that takes as one of its key priorities the restructuring of the electoral process. A summit that seeks to help change political discourse in this country so that it is a true reflection of the needs and ideas of the people. I hope as we go forward we can remember First Lady Michelle Obama’s words: “When they go low, we go high.”
Damita Brown, PhD, is a poet and a painter. Born and raised in Iowa, she studied at the University of Washington and University of California, Santa Cruz. She is the author of the self-published collection of poems ‘Beyond Struggle’ and the forthcoming work ‘Endless Road.’ This article was originally published in Little Village issue 210.