Advertisement

Letter to the Editor: Balance schools, minimize barriers to education


By Mary Kate Pilcher Hayek, Iowa City

The [Iowa City Community School District] school board special election on July 19 offers the community a unique opportunity to take important steps forward. For members of the community who participated in the development of the Facilities Master Plan (FMP), we are anxious to see improvements to schools throughout the district.

In May 2015, the school board passed a secondary boundaries plan consistent with the FMP that balanced socioeconomic populations at the three junior highs and three comprehensive high schools. Among many other contingencies, the plan directs students from Kirkwood to Liberty High and students from Alexander to West.

A few weeks ago, Directors Chris Liebig, Lori Roetlin, Phil Hemingway and Tom Yates stunned the community by rejecting the May 2015 plan. Three days later, Director Yates resigned.

In their recent guest opinions, Directors Liebig and Roetlin said they do not want to “burden the most vulnerable” students by having them take a bus to school. They fail to mention that most students at Alexander and Kirkwood are not in walking distance of any of the high schools. Further, the May 2015 plan included school-paid busing, making it unnecessary for students to pay out-of-pocket. They fail to mention the data from our own district showing no correlation between academic achievement and the distance a student lives from school. And they fail to mention the data from our own district showing an 88% correlation between schools with disproportionately high free or reduced lunch (FRL) populations and reading and math proficiency. In other words, disproportionate FRL population is the most accurate indicator of barriers to education in this district; busing is not a barrier to education.

With apparent disregard for the data (which is on the district’s website), the Liebig plan keeps City High over capacity and enrolls twice as many students qualifying for FRL at City and West High than at Liberty High, which will be significantly under capacity. These socioeconomic and racial disparities will only increase. Based on the data from our own district, the Liebig plan reinforces barriers to learning created by disproportionate FRL populations.

Still, in his June 29 blog post, Director Liebig accuses those favoring a balanced district of “treating low-income families worse than other families.” According to Liebig, we should send students to schools that are closer to their homes even though we know — with empirical certainty — that they will face barriers to education.

Director Liebig’s “solution” is to allocate more resources to our overcrowded, high-FRL schools. To be effective, weighted resource allocation would require the district to cut large class sizes in half and hire more teachers. Under the Liebig plan, there is no space for additional classrooms and, thanks to the Iowa Legislature, no funding for additional teachers. Another consequence: Schools with low FRL populations will pay the price by having the largest classroom sizes in the district.

Director Liebig has cautioned the community against talking about white flight and segregation because he says it might offend poor and minority students. He writes that proponents of a balanced district are “channeling alarmism and fear.” Our district’s demographics show that people with resources already choose not to live in higher poverty neighborhoods. If the community finds this reality alarming, we should do something to help poor people and people of color instead of reinforcing barriers to their education.

Directors Liebig and Roetlin have argued that we should not balance the secondary schools until the elementary schools are balanced. Because everyone agrees that balancing the elementary schools will take years to accomplish, we should at least mitigate barriers at the secondary level in the meantime.

On July 19, I will vote for Paul Roesler. Paul supports the May 2015 plan that moves the district forward. Our community cannot afford to reinvent the FMP every time we elect new board members. Paul will hit the ground running so that our children can reap the FMP’s benefits.

Mary Kate Pilcher Hayek is a local attorney. She has a Master’s in Education and was formerly a high school English and Spanish teacher.


Comments:

  1. Why the silence on the discussion about the effectiveness of Balancing, Busing, and Boundary Policy?

    It’s not like just a few of the district’s that tried Economic Balancing failed, district after district tells the story of failure and short coming. So why the disregard of that discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep it free.

Voluntary contributions from readers like you help keep Little Village free for everyone.

Please consider a one-time or monthly sustaining contribution, in any amount.

Advertisement

A collaboration between The Englert Theatre and FilmScene

STRENGTHEN
GROW•EVOLVE

Help us build the greatest small city for the arts in America—right here in Iowa City. Learn more »

Donate Today

Strengthen • Grow • Evolve is a collaborative campaign led by two Iowa City-based arts nonprofits, The Englert Theatre and FilmScene that seeks a major reinvestment to strengthen the arts through modern and historic venues, innovative programming, and new models of collaboration.

Little Village's
BEST OF THE CRANDIC

The results are in! Find out which of your favorite CR and IC haunts took home a prize.