Advertisement

The Iowa City Charter faces revisions, may see changes to exclusive petition policy


Illustration by Erin Weitzell
The Iowa City Charter Review Commission is considering four possible changes. — illustration by Erin Weitzell

Full disclosure: Adam Sullivan is a member of the Iowa City Charter Review Commission. The following viewpoints are his own.

Our founding fathers thought petitioning the government was such an important right, they put it right there in the First Amendment to the Constitution. It doesn’t get as much exposure as the freedom of speech and religion, but it’s still there—right at the top of the Bill of Rights.

The ‘right to petition the government’ is generally taken to mean that you can complain to your elected officials, but here in Iowa City, that right is underlined and bolded. Iowa City residents can organize legally binding petitions to adopt new ordinances or change existing ones. It’s an exceptional democratic experiment, and for the most part, it’s worked out well for our community.

Your Village

The Iowa City Charter Review Commission has focused on three other possible changes to the city charter.

Council compensation

Council members receive about $7,000 annually for their services. They have the ability to increase their own pay, but haven’t done so in the last 20 years.

Some would like to see council members earn higher compensation. Some argue that the meager compensation and the hefty time commitment for city councilors precludes many who simply can’t afford to hold city office. On the other hand, if you pay much more, then council candidates may begin to be more motivated by compensation than by the idea of serving the community.

District representation

The council is made up of four at-large seats and three district seats. The district council members have to live in the geographic district they represent, but everyone—not just voters in the district—gets a vote for each seat.

Some say we should go to “true districts,” giving citizens a vote only in at-large races and in their own district. Others, though, say the current system makes all the council members accessible to everyone, instead of district council members serving only their district’s interests.

Election of the mayor

Rather than voting on a mayor, Iowa City residents elect council members, and subsequently, the council selects a mayor from its own ranks. Supporters of that system say it works well for the weak-mayor form of government we have, where the mayor’s only duties are to run meetings and do the ceremonial bits. As one community member told me at a public forum, “a little more democracy is probably not a bad thing.”

But not everyone is allowed to participate in the petitioning process. If you’re a tax-paying, law-abiding Iowa City resident but you haven’t gotten around to filling out voter registration paperwork, our city charter says your signature doesn’t count.

That charter—our city government’s founding document—calls for its own review at least once per decade. The current Charter Review Commission—which consists of myself and eight other Iowa City residents appointed by the City Council—is considering changing the requirements for who can sign a petition.

Iowa City is one of just two places in the state where citizens can launch petitions to change the city code or pass new ordinances, and if an initiative or referendum petition gets enough valid signatures, the council has to either adopt the proposal or send it to voters for a simple majority vote.

SIGN UP TODAY

Subscribe for daily news updates from Little Village

SUBSCRIBE

However, only signatures from so-called qualified electors—those who are currently registered to vote in Iowa City—are counted. Signatures from many so-called eligible electors—signatures from those who are eligible to register, but who aren’t currently registered in Iowa City—are disregarded.

In one instance, a group of petitioners had 40 percent of their signatures are thrown out.

In 2013, a group of citizen-activists organized an effort to ban automated traffic enforcement devices. They thought they’d met the 2,500 signatures required to advance their proposal, but after the signatures were checked against voter registration rolls, they came up short.

They eventually met the requirement, but only after gathering around 4,300 signatures in total. Some 1,800 surplus signatures didn’t count because they couldn’t be verified as registered voters.

Some supporters of the current standards say that this encourages people to register, or that it’s the least someone can do if they want their say. One local commentator was quoted in the Press-Citizen saying, “If a citizen doesn’t care enough about their government to register to vote, why should I care what they want?”

It’s along the same line of thinking as “you can’t complain if you don’t vote.” It’s a nice slogan, but it’s not true. People who don’t vote still have to pay taxes, can still be fined by the government and can still be detained if they’re accused of breaking laws. Of course they can—and should—complain about their government.

And since election voting is actually a relatively ineffective way to change your government, it shouldn’t be any wonder why so many people avoid voting in the first place. If people choose not to register, should they be shut out of political participation altogether?

The whole distinction between “qualified” and “eligible” voters is contrary to the spirit of Iowa politics. Since the last Charter Review Commission met, Iowa law has changed to allow us to register to vote on election day at our polling places. That process eliminates the distinction between voters and non-voters—all eligible adults have the same right to walk into their polling place and vote, regardless of prior paperwork.

Meanwhile, city staff spend considerable time checking petitions against voter registration rolls. The restrictions are far greater than we require for signatures on politicians’ candidacy petitions, which are counted as long as they have a qualifying address.

Some constituents I’ve heard from are also worried—myself included—about whose signatures are being thrown out. People who are new to our community are among the most likely not to have a valid local registration, and because we know young people and poor people tend to be more transient, we have to carefully consider who we’re excluding from the petition process.

The debate over Iowa City’s petition rules has earned the attention of the American Civil Liberties Union. Their lawyers have written to the commission, pointing out that state law prescribes a petition process much less stringent than Iowa City’s. According to Iowa Code, petitions are valid if they include signatures from “eligible electors, equal to 10 percent of the number of voters in the previous city election.  The signers only have to be “eligible electors,” and the petition only needs signatures equal to 10 percent of the voters in the previous city council election. In Iowa City, that would be be about 1,000—far fewer than the 2,500-plus required by the city charter.

Our city attorney disagrees with the ACLU’s interpretation, saying that portion of the Iowa code doesn’t apply to initiative and referendum petitions that are permitted through city  charter code. Since I’m not a lawyer, I don’t know about the legal question. What I do know is that easing the petition standards wouldn’t hurt us. Say there is a silly or misguided petition that scrapes together a thousand signatures, the worst that could happen is that it would go on a ballot. Reasonable people that we are, we would reject it.

So what are we afraid of? A little bit of democracy?


Thoughts? Tips? A cute picture of a dog? Share them with LV » editor@littlevillagemag.com

Advertisement

Summer Programs 2020

Get 150+ local restaurants delivered to your door in the Iowa City & Cedar Rapids areas!

The Future is Unwritten

You look to Little Village for today’s stories. Your sustaining support will help us write tomorrow’s.

Regular

$10/mo or $120/year
(AUTO-RENEW)
The cost of doing this work really adds up! Your contribution at this level will cover telephone and internet expenses for one month at the LV editorial offices.

Italic

$20/mo or $240/year
(AUTO-RENEW)
$240 is enough to cover one month’s costs for sending out our weekly entertainment newsletter, The Weekender. Make a contribution at this level to put a little more oomph on your support and your weekend.

Bold

$30/mo or $360/year
(AUTO-RENEW)
LittleVillageMag.com connects eastern Iowa culture with the world. Your contribution at this level will cover the site’s hosting costs for three months. A bold move for our boldest supporters!

All monthly and annual contributors receive:

  • Recognition on our Supporters page (aliases welcome)
  • Exclusive early access when we release new half-price gift cards
  • Access to a secret Facebook group where you can connect with other supporters and discuss the latest news and upcoming events (and maybe swap pet pics?) with the LV staff
  • Invitations to periodic publisher chats (held virtually for now) to meet with Matt and give him a piece of your mind, ask your burning questions and hear more about the future plans for Little Village, Bread & Butter Magazine, Witching Hour Festival and our other endeavors.

Coralville Public Library Online Summer Reading Programs

For ages 0-99+