Advertisement

Grassley on Trump’s tax returns: ‘I don’t want to see them’

  • 185
    Shares

Video still of Sen. Chuck Grassley presiding over the Senate Judiciary Committee’s consideration of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, Sept. 28, 2018.

During a Monday morning appearance on Fox News, Sen. Chuck Grassley was asked about the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee (or as the Fox host put it, “the Democrats”) requesting copies of President Trump’s tax returns from the IRS.

Grassley began his reply by pointing out that as chair of the Senate Finance Committee, he is also entitled to request the president’s tax returns. But he won’t.

“I don’t want to see them,” Grassley said. “I’m not going to request them.”

Grassley told the Fox hosts that Congress has no legitimate interest in obtaining Trump’s tax returns.

According to Grassley, “the only reason you should be asking for tax returns” is “if you need to write legislation, then maybe you need some information from people that are avoiding taxes or using tax loopholes or maybe not [sic] finding a way to get out and you want to change the law.”

It’s a claim Grassley made at greater length during a speech on the Senate floor on April 4, the day after Ways and Means Chair Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA), sent a letter requesting the returns to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig.

Grassley is misstating both what the law regarding Congressional requests of tax returns says, and what the intent of Congress was in passing it.

The law Neal is relying on does not place any restriction on the purposes for which tax returns may be requested, and it was passed in 1924 specifically to allow selected members of Congress to examine the finances of members of the executive branch as part of their oversight duties.

The law was written in response to “Teapot Dome” and other scandals during the administration of President Warren G. Harding.

In 1922, Harding’s secretary of the interior, Albert Fall, solicited bribes while deciding which oil companies would receive leases to drill for oil on federal land near Teapot Dome, Wyoming. The Senate launched an investigation of the leases, and Teapot Dome became the most famous scandal in American political history, until its notoriety was eclipsed by Watergate.

The Harding administration resisted the Senate investigation, claiming senators were exceeding their oversight authority. The Senate sued, and in 1927 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in its favor, explicitly establishing Congress’ ability to compel cooperation from members of the executive branch during investigations.

Curious what's happening this weekend? Sign up here to stay in the know.

(In 1929, Fall was convicted for accepting bribes, and went to jail. Harding died in 1923, while still in office.)

The 1924 law, as amended in 1976, states the IRS commissioner “shall furnish” any tax returns requested by certain members of Congress responsible for tax policy, including the Ways and Means chair. It does not allow for any discretion on the part of the commissioner regarding the request, or give authority to the Treasury Secretary or any other official to challenge it.

In his Senate floor speech, Grassley said the president and vice president’s tax return should be kept confidential in the same way those of an average citizen are. “Not a different standard [of confidentiality],” he said. “The same standard.”

The Supreme Court has restricted the ability of Congress to investigate average citizens, but the court recognized those restrictions don’t apply to elected officials, such as the president.

Neal has requested five years (2013-2018) of Donald Trump’s personal returns, as well as returns for eight of Trump’s companies. In his letter to Rettig, Neal explained the committee is “conducting oversight related to our Federal tax laws, including, but not limited to, the extent to which the IRS audits and enforces Federal tax laws against a President.”

Testifying before Congress on Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was asked if the tax returns Neal requested would be turned over.

“It is our intent to follow the law,” Mnuchin said. “It is being reviewed by the legal departments and we look forward to responding to the letter.”

The only previous occasion Congress considered using the 1924 law to obtain presidential tax returns came when it was investigating whether Richard Nixon had illegally avoided paying taxes. Nixon ended up voluntarily turning over his returns to congressional investigators.

“I welcome this kind of examination because people have got to know whether or not their president’s a crook,” Nixon said, when asked about his decision to cooperate.


  • 185
    Shares

Comments:

  1. It’s surprising Senator Grassley doesn’t remember this bill being passed
    as he was a Senate page during the Harding administration.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keep it free.

Voluntary contributions from readers like you help keep Little Village free for everyone.

Please consider a one-time or monthly sustaining contribution, in any amount.

Little Village's
BEST OF THE CRANDIC

The results are in! Find out which of your favorite CR and IC haunts took home a prize.