Advertisement

American Reason: Addressing personhood


As we recently saw with the Wendy Davis filibuster in Texas, the abortion debate has started heating up again. Many conservative states appear to be competing to see who can ban abortions at the earliest stage of pregnancy, and in August, Mississippi may become the first state to de facto ban abortion clinics through rigorous regulation. To those on the Left, this push often feels like a relentless assault on a woman’s right to choose. Is compromise possible, or are we doomed to argue about this forever?

Matt Sowada: Vik, I’ve had a bit of an epiphany: I am pro-life and I’ll bet you are too. This might be slightly shocking coming from someone who self-identifies as a feminist and believes that abortion ought to be safe, legal and rare. Furthermore, I’m sure you’re sitting there saying to yourself, “Come on Matt, I think I’d know if I was pro-life or not”—but hear me out. What I’m saying is that I fundamentally agree with the way the Right tends to frame the abortion issue, just not with their conclusions. To me, the key question that we have to answer in the abortion debate is one of personhood.

In our society, we do sometimes consider it morally appropriate for one human being to extinguish the life of another, but only in very rare circumstances. Typically, we only agree that killing a person is acceptable when doing so seems like the only way to protect the life of an innocent. Think of a sniper dropping a kidnapper in a hostage situation. Obviously, you can see where I’m going with this. When is the fetus not just alive, but a person? Traditionally, there have been two main answers to this question: at conception or at viability. Doesn’t the fact that virtually no one argues that someone ought to have the right to abort a fetus that has been developing for eight and a half months (without extremely good reasons) indicate that this debate is really about human “life” and not “choice”?

Vik Patel: I think you’re right that the way in which discussions of late-term abortions are framed show that this issue is ultimately about when a fetus should be treated as a person, so let’s examine the legal ramifications of the two traditional criteria for personhood that you brought up: conception and viability. I don’t think that defining conception as the beginning of personhood is either morally right or legally feasible. After the fertilization of an egg, there are many factors and a bit of random chance that determine whether or not that fertilized egg will implant itself into the wall of the uterus and whether or not the pregnancy will successfully continue after implantation. If we define the beginning of personhood as that of conception, then a woman’s eating and exercise habits could be used against her in pursuit of a manslaughter charge if she were to have a miscarriage. We all can agree on the ridiculousness of such a legal framework. Viability, on the other hand, seems to be a much more reasonable criterion. However, we have seen the moment of viability moving closer and closer to that of conception, and even though they are far apart now, there’s no reason to believe that we will not eventually develop technology that would allow for a fetus to develop completely outside of the uterus.

To better understand the beginning of personhood, I think it would be informative to examine the end of personhood: death. In our society, a person is legally dead at the moment of brain death. Even if the body can be sustained by artificial means we consider a person to be dead after their brain stops functioning. Likewise, we should consider the beginning of personhood to be when the brain starts functioning. Putting an exact date on this will likely require more study of fetal development, but the line will probably fall between eight and nine weeks, when neurons start to develop, and 20-26 weeks, when sustained electrical activity starts in the neocortex of the fetus. Unfortunately, the focus of Roe v. Wade on the right to privacy has distracted our society from agreeing on when personhood begins and has left the door open for those who wish to ban abortion.

Matt: Well, choosing the beginning of “brain life” as the beginning of personhood makes sense to me, but I’m struck by your jab at Roe v. Wade! That decision has been taking a pounding lately, and not just from the Right. Back in May the Huffington Post reported that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg commented on the toll the conservative “backlash” to Roe v. Wade has had on American political process, saying the decision went “too far, too fast.” I mean, it’s true that we’ve been arguing about it for 40 years now, and as you pointed out it has been distracting, but what’s the alternative? If Roe v. Wade had been decided differently we’d still be debating the topic of abortion, just likely at the state level. The biggest difference would be that thousands and thousands of women would have been forced to get dangerous back-alley abortions instead of medically supervised ones.

It sounds like we mostly agree on this one, but just to make sure you get a chance to alienate every single person in Iowa City, I’ve got one more question for you: What does our definition of personhood mean for pregnancies that are the result of rape or incest? Should society force women to carry a baby to term once it’s become a person in those cases? After all, it’s not the fetus’s fault it was conceived under such deplorable conditions, but it also feels wrong to force pregnancy on someone who is unwilling.

Vik: Though rape and incest are terrible injustices, once a fetus passes the point of personhood then it should have the same rights afforded to any other person. As such, the only reasonable justification for a very late-term abortion would be if continuing the pregnancy endangers the health of the mother. However, before that transition into personhood an abortion should be safe, legal, accessible and entirely the choice of the woman.

Vikram Patel and Matt Sowada are the friendly adversaries behind the twice-weekly ethical debates series, American Reason. Listen on KRUI every Sunday from 4-5 p.m.


Thoughts? Tips? A cute picture of a dog? Share them with LV » editor@littlevillagemag.com

Advertisement

Advertisement

Summer Programs 2020

Get 150+ local restaurants delivered to your door in the Iowa City & Cedar Rapids areas!

Advertisement

New Year, New Career!

Free Help Desk & Systems Admin Education available to Iowans impacted by COVID.

Sign Up Today

Advertisement

Apply for a seat on the Human Rights Commission

Apply Today

The Future is Unwritten

You look to Little Village for today’s stories. Your sustaining support will help us write tomorrow’s.

Regular

$10/mo or $120/year
(AUTO-RENEW)
The cost of doing this work really adds up! Your contribution at this level will cover telephone and internet expenses for one month at the LV editorial offices.

Italic

$20/mo or $240/year
(AUTO-RENEW)
$240 is enough to cover one month’s costs for sending out our weekly entertainment newsletter, The Weekender. Make a contribution at this level to put a little more oomph on your support and your weekend.

Bold

$30/mo or $360/year
(AUTO-RENEW)
LittleVillageMag.com connects eastern Iowa culture with the world. Your contribution at this level will cover the site’s hosting costs for three months. A bold move for our boldest supporters!

All monthly and annual contributors receive:

  • Recognition on our Supporters page (aliases welcome)
  • Exclusive early access when we release new half-price gift cards
  • Access to a secret Facebook group where you can connect with other supporters and discuss the latest news and upcoming events (and maybe swap pet pics?) with the LV staff
  • Invitations to periodic publisher chats (held virtually for now) to meet with Matt and give him a piece of your mind, ask your burning questions and hear more about the future plans for Little Village, Bread & Butter Magazine, Witching Hour Festival and our other endeavors.

Advertisement

Randy's Flooring is a local, employee-owned retailed that has been part of the Corridor for over 40 years, delivering quality and value through the largest selection of carpet, tile, hardwood, window treatments, and specialty products supported by the knowledgeable staff and in-house flooring designers who can help transform residential and commercial spaces.

 
Get Started