
It was a late Tuesday morning last December, and Erin Sullivan had been home with her newborn baby for just a day. As she sat down in her front living room to feed her four-day-old son, there was a pounding on the door.
According to Sullivanโs account of the story, she got up, baby in her arms, and walked toward the door. Just before she could reach for the knob, the house was rocked, the windows crashed in, shots were fired at the door and she heard two disorientingly loud bangs.
Sullivan says she ran to her nearby kitchen to squat behind a counter as Johnson County cops in SWAT gear stormed inside equipped with long guns, all-black clothes and headgear. Her repeated pleading, “I have a baby,” was met with officers yelling at her to get on the ground. After what seemed like a full minute of chaos, an officer noticed the infant, announced it to his colleagues and Sullivan and her son were escorted out the back door to the unheated garage.
The young mother says she sat in the garage for nearly an hour as cops searched every inch of her home. They eventually brought her inside as they finished the search, asked her some questions and told her they were taking a few of her things, including her legally possessed firearm.
After the two-hour ordeal, Sullivan was left to piece together her ravaged homeโno front door, no living room windows, burns on the carpet and belongings strewn about. It would take two months and roughly $3,000 to get her home mostly back to normal.

“Everything in every cupboard, every closet, every drawer, was no longer in its place. They did a total search of the house,” Sullivan said.
Sullivan learned that the raid was part of a Johnson County Drug Task Force investigation on the father of her son. He has a lengthy legal history and there are charges against him now, but Sullivan says he wasn’t living in her home, there wasn’t anything illegal going on at the home and no contraband was found there.
โI don’t understand why they decided to come into my house the way they did and put me and my son in danger the way that they did,” Sullivan said.
She wonders why police are going into family neighborhoods without caution for children. If cops were investigating the home, didn’t they notice the pregnant woman or newborn baby?
The Iowa City Police Department uses a “risk matrix” to determine situations that require the department’s Special Response Team. For instance, the team may be called in if a suspect or someone “associated with the address” has a history of violence.
Iowa City cops say they do take care to avoid harm to children or other innocent bystanders, but since they wonโt comment on open and pending cases like Sullivanโs, itโs not clear whether cops knew there was a baby in the home or whether they took specific precautions in this case.
“A significant amount of intelligence goes into that to determine when the least number of people will be home, try to make sure kids aren’t there, try to get people outside the residence,” Iowa City Sgt. Scott Gaarde said.
Special Response,ย or Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT), teams are common across the country and have been around for a few decades. They began as a tool for responding to urgent threats like hostage situations and active shooters, but are now usually used for planned operations, like to serve search warrants, often for drugs.
Special Response Team officers carry much more powerful gear than a cop on the street: ballistic coverings, tactical weapons, breaching shotguns, chemical munitions and more. Local cops also have access to a mine-resistant ambush-protected vehiclesโmilitary surplus from Kuwait, acquired as part of the federal government’s 1033 program.
A report from the American Civil Liberties Union earlier this year analyzed 800 domestic SWAT deployments between 2011 and 2012 (that’s a lot, but not all, of the SWAT raids in those years, and it’s unclear how the ACLU gathered the police department data). In the vast majority of cases the ACLU studied, 79 percent, special response teams were used to search homes rather than to respond to an imminent violent threat.
โWhat constitutes a โhigh-riskโ scenario depends largely on the subjective beliefs of the officers involved. This lack of clear and legitimate standards for deploying SWAT may result in the excessive and unnecessary use of SWAT deployments in drug cases,โ the authors of the ACLU report wrote.
Here in Iowa City, the SWAT team is used relatively rarely. Most recently, the Special Response Team was called in for a standoff situation in mid-October when a man allegedly made threats to hurt his neighbors. That situation was resolved without injury as the man exited the home after talking with crisis negotiators.
The local SWAT team was used just seven times over the course of 12 months in records obtained through an open records request. Between June 2013 and this past May, Iowa City used its Special Response Team in four drug searches and three potential weapons threats.
More attention has been paid to this style of policing since Ferguson, Missouri, cops drew criticism over the summer for their aggressive response to citizen protests. Sullivan said she’s paid attention to the issue and she’s hopeful more Americans are growing concerned too.
Still, the myriad law enforcement controversies swirling around have her questioning whether she feels safe raising her son here in Iowa City.
“If I’m at home and I see a police officer driving around the neighborhood, cars driving around slowly, especially at nighttime, it makes me very nervous,” Sullivan said. “Unless there’s something really big, I don’t know if I would ever call the police and come assist me.”


Wow, this is absolutely disgusting. Destroying a home, endangering a newborn, and putting a brand new mother at risk of possibly years of PTSD ?
I am truly sorry to Erin Sullivan to have to endure something so truamatic for something she absolutely did not deserve. This is another tragic example of how the “war on drugs” is probably more damaging than drugs themselves. How maddening. I wish for peace and healing for her And her home.
This is revolting! Why does the local police force (and really any police force these days) feel the need to act like (and dress like) boot-stomping Gestapo officers? Also WHY WERE SHOTS FIRED? In the 1990s you got on the front cover of magazines and caused a national panic for pointing a loaded gun at a mother cowering with a child…now I guess you don’t even get noticed for FIRING SHOTS. What the heck!!
Yep. Sounds like the iowa city police department forsure. They dont know what they are doing and continue to harass people. Reminds me of when they shot that homeless man by the Vine for reaching for his wallet. i saw that happen and the police officer walk. made me sick. same with the Nlpd. shot that man in his trailer bc he wouldn’t come out. thank god kevin kinney didn’t grt elected for senate bc it would just make these situations worse. we don’t need or want a horrible police department like the ICPD
There needs to be an outside entity that can investigate and prosecute corrupt and evil police.
I do think this article raises valid concerns and questions which the police should answer. Were the police given an opportunity to respond? If they failed to respond, that is a mistake on their part. If they were not given the opportunity to respond, then the article is unfair and biased. Questions which should be answered are: What was the incident date that gave them the probable cause for the warrant, and how much time elapsed between the incident date and the service of the warrant? Why didn’t they have more facts to show that he actually was there when the warrant was served? Why was a SWAT team needed? Why did it require so much force and property damage? Will the police pay for the damage done?
However, I do think there are some flaws in this article in that the eventually arrested man’s name was not listed, nor were the specifics of his criminal history. Perhaps that could give the reader more facts to fairly evaluate his potential threat. Why was she dating a guy with a lengthy criminal history?
There is no question that the article has an anti-police slant, but that doesn’t change the facts. Shots were fired by the police when they were not being threatened. Can she even sue for damages?
I hope she bills them for the damages. That is ridiculous. Hoping she didn’t have a bunch of money in the home for them to confiscate too.