Bloody Run Creek in Clayton County. โ€” courtesy of the Sierra Club of Iowa

The Iowa Department of Natural Resources issued a final action on a water-use permit to a 10,000-head cattle operation in Clayton County, following a years-long legal battle with an area environmental group. 

The group, Driftless Water Defenders, announced Thursday it would appeal the DNR decision to renew the permit.

A group of citizens initially challenged a 2022 decision by the department to renew a water-use permit for the confined-animal feeding operation, which eventually led to a ruling from an administrative judge that the department should consider water quality, as well as quantity, in the situation.

Administrative Law Judge Toby Gordon remanded the permit and instructed the agency to consider โ€œfactors beyond the quantity of waterโ€ including the โ€œpublicโ€™s health, safety [and] interests in lands or watersโ€ in November 2024.ย 

Much of Gordonโ€™s decision, and the Driftless Water Defendersโ€™ testimony, drew on the importance of protecting Bloody Run Creek, one of Iowaโ€™s โ€œoutstanding waters,โ€ and concerns around groundwater entering the porous bedrock of the โ€œdriftlessโ€ region of northeast Iowa. 

On Jan. 9, Driftless Water Defenders submitted a complaint to DNR. Leaning on Gordonโ€™s ruling, it urged the department to cancel Supreme Beefโ€™s water use permit. The complaint was signed by nearly 100 citizens. 

A view of the cold-water streams and limestone cliffs signature to the Driftless Area, seen in Pikes Peak State Park, McGregor, Iowa. โ€” Adria Carpenter/Little Village

The group argues the large amounts of manure produced by the cattle operation will negatively impact the nearby creek and groundwater. 

DNR notified Driftless Water Defendersโ€™ attorney James Larew of its final agency action on the case Jan. 16. The memorandum, provided to Iowa Capital Dispatch by Larew, says DNR considered factors โ€œbeyond the mere quality of waterโ€ to show a beneficial use for the permitโ€™s renewal. 

In the document, DNR said water use at the facility would not adversely affect surrounding landowners, would not โ€œunreasonably impairโ€ the long term quantity or quality of water available, and that the water-use permit would be in the โ€œbest interest of the people.โ€ 

โ€œThe DNR finds that providing water for livestock care serves the best interests and welfare of Iowans โ€ฆ In brief, agriculture is a pillar of Iowaโ€™s economy, generating revenue, taxes and creating jobs,โ€ the memorandum read. 

DNR points to other laws protecting water, air and natural resources that Supreme Beef must comply with. 

โ€œPermit no. 10172-R1 was not issued in a vacuum; instead, the program considered and gave deference to these other laws and programs,โ€ it said. โ€œThe consumption of water by livestock will not threaten or harm the public or public interest.โ€ 

Pigs in a CAFO (concentrated animal feed operation). โ€” via the United States Geological Survey

A press release from Driftless Water Defenders said the DNR action and the groupโ€™s โ€œcitizen-supported complaintโ€ from earlier in the month โ€œopens the wayโ€ for appeals to the decision. 

โ€œThe DNRโ€™s response evades the letter and spirit of Administrative Law Judge Toby Gordonโ€™s determination,โ€ Larew said in a statement. โ€œThe agency violated Iowa law when it renewed the water use permit to Supreme Beef.ย  DNR has apparently learned nothing.ย  As a result, and if uncorrected by the Iowa District Court on appeal, the integrity of one of Iowaโ€™s finest water bodies โ€” Bloody Run Creek โ€” will have been placed in great jeopardy.โ€

Cami Koons covers agriculture and the environment for Iowa Capital Dispatch, where this story first appeared.